The Arms Race and Peace
on Earth
Justice Perspective
Deacon Don Weigel
I remember being really scared
as a young boy by the possibility that our country would be entering into
nuclear war. It was October of 1962, and the U.S. and Russia were staring each
other down in what was later called the “Cuban Missile Crisis”. Blessed Pope
John XXIII, urged both parties to “spare the world from the horrors of a war
whose terrifying consequences no one can predict”. A short time later, Russia withdrew the
missiles from Cuba and war was averted.
In April of 1963, Pope John XXIII
issued his encyclical Peace on Earth
(Pacem in terris), and this year we celebrate the 50th
anniversary of this amazing document. The topic of the encyclical is, as its
title suggests, peace; but only the last chapters deal with the traditional
issues of international peace. The beginning of the document is a long essay on
all of the issues that support a peaceful earth: human rights,
responsibilities, relations between people, and a very profound section that
defines the “common good”.
What is really significant is that
Pope John interprets international relations based on the rights and dignity of
human beings. He reasons that since all people have rights to a worthy standard
of living, to food, clothing, shelter, and medical care, then whatever prevents
societies from being able to provide those things to its citizens works against
the common good.
In particular, this is one of his
major criticisms of the “arms race” at the time. Not only does it produce a
world that lives in fear, but it increases the likelihood that war, in fact,
will break out given the build-up of weapons around the world. Pope John called
desperately for reducing the production of all weapons, and made an appeal that
the stockpiles of weapons should be decreased, that all nuclear weapons should
be banned, and nations should stop the financial outlay on armaments.
Given this papal teaching, what are we
to think about the current situation of arms and weapons in our own country?
The state of affairs here in the U.S. is quite disturbing in light of this
encyclical by Pope John.
For example, here in the United States
we spent over $1 trillion (yes, that’s trillion) on the military last year,
including the costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That number includes
defense, weapons, nuclear arms, military personnel – everything related to our
military operations.
And, most startling, according to the
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, that represents over 40% of
all the spending on military in the entire world. By comparison, China’s
spending, which is second, is only about 8%, and Russia’s is only about 4%.
With what Pope John said about reducing spending on arms, shouldn't we be
uncomfortable with that amount of money going to military purposes?
When it comes to nuclear stockpiles,
it is estimated that the United States has over 7.700 nuclear weapons right
now. And, we are planning to spend over $600 billion over the next ten years to
increase that number. How can we reconcile that with Pope John’s teaching (and
continued Catholic teaching) about reducing and eliminating nuclear weapons?
These are very difficult questions
that we must wrestle with as Catholics – both in our own consciences as well as
in our parishes and our schools and in discussion with each other. What seems
to be clear is that we cannot dismiss this landmark teaching of Blessed Pope
John XXIII easily without risking doing damage to our Catholic conscience.
No comments:
Post a Comment