This is the day after Doug Jones narrowly defeated Roy Moore for the remaining term of the Senate seat of Curtis Strange. I make it a habit to switch around from CNN to FOX to MSNBC to see what these outlets are saying in reaction to the headlines. I find it to be interesting and enlightening to hear views from across the political spectrum.
But today was a day that made me shout out loud at the TV (am I turning into THAT GUY?) when I was watching FOX and Friends. They had this great little story about two runners in a marathon in Dallas over the weekend - the woman who was going to take the women's title was collapsing just yards from the finish line, and a high-school relay runner stopped and helped her get across. A great story of compassion over competition and human kindness.
Now, it wasn't that FOX and Friends were the only ones who covered the story. As you can imagine, news outlets everywhere had this as part of their shows, with interviews of the two women, and praise from whatever news commentators were covering the story. But Steve Doocy, never one to waste an opportunity to say something inappropriate, commented that it was a good thing that it happened in the South, because if it had happened "in New York City or a lot of other places" no one would have stopped to help.
And there it is. An offhand comment that implies that "big cities" (even though this happened in Dallas), and people on the two coasts (even though the runner who had been helped was a psychiatric doctor in NYC!) are not compassionate or kind. This is the kind of insidious nature of bigotry that creeps into our brains if we are not constantly vigilant to reject it. It is like the comments that folks make about "those people" or when we see posts on Facebook and other places that show blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, and others in unflattering light.
Sometimes there are outright statements and opinions that show a person's bigotry - right after this story about the marathon, FOX and Friends had a short interview with Michele Malkin (another FOX commentator) who was screaming - and I am not really exaggerating - about how we can only prevent terror actions like the one the other day in NYC if we don't let in anyone who can't prove that they will help make America great. At least with those "in your face" arguments others can respond, but the offhand comment, the wink and nod of racist jokes and "humor", the bigotry by implication and innuendo is insidious and eats at our psyche and gets stuck in our subconscious.
If we want to begin to drive out racism, to help people see "the other" with compassion and human decency, to guard ourselves against this insidious bigotry, then maybe we have to raise our own awareness of when it is happening, and reject it from our thinking - and maybe it starts with shouting at the TV.
A blog of thoughts, questions, and musings from someone who reflects on the journey and not just the destination.
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Thursday, September 7, 2017
Stand in Support of Dreamers
Stand in Support of DREAMERS
Justice Perspective
– September 2017
Deacon Don Weigel
Parents will do just about anything for their children. Sacrifice is a quality that seems built in to
being a parent, and protecting your children from danger, suffering, or threats
to their life and well-being is both natural and expected.
Is it any wonder, then, why parents who were escaping
dangerous conditions in their own land would bring their children with them? Or
is it beyond belief that things could be so bad in some places that parents
would send their children away – even alone – to find safety or a better life
in another land?
Over the past few years, I have had the opportunity to
travel to places like El Salvador and Guatemala, and I have witnessed the
poverty, crime, and gang culture that pervades those places and many of their
neighboring countries as well. As beautiful as those countries are, and as
genuine as their people are, the conditions under which they live can sometimes
be so extremely dangerous or unlivable that they choose to flee their country
in hopes for a better life in ours.
Put aside for the moment the actions of the parents who entered
the U. S. without going through the proper procedures, and think about the
children that they brought with them. For their children, brought into our
country sometimes at a very young age, the U. S. is the only country they have
really known; they have attended school, played with their classmates and
neighbors, and as they have grown up they have worked and paid taxes, served in
the military, or become leaders in their parishes or communities.
These children have been called DREAMERS, and in 2012, the
Obama administration began a program called DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals), which gave protection to these undocumented immigrants who came here
as children, have lived here since 2007, and met other requirements. There are
nearly 800,000 young people who have registered for this program and it has
allowed them to work and study in the U.S.
For various political reasons, that program is now in
jeopardy, and the DREAMERS now may face deportation – even if they have
committed no crime, and have been contributing members of our society.
In order to protect them, a bipartisan bill has been
introduced in both houses of Congress. It is called The Dream Act of 2017
(S.1615 in the Senate and H.R.3440 in the House of Representatives). The bill
would provide young undocumented immigrants - who were brought to the United
States as children and have lived in the U.S. at least four years - protection
from deportation and an opportunity to obtain legal status if they meet certain
requirements.
The US Bishops support this bill, and have always supported
the DREAMERS because as Catholics we
believe in protecting the dignity of every human being, especially that of our
children.
You can lend your support to the effort to pass this bill by
going to www.justiceforimmigrants.org,
the Bishops’ site for immigration issues, and tell your Senator and
Representative to sponsor and support this bill that will ensure the dignity
and security of DREAMERS.
Tuesday, May 2, 2017
Our God Allows U-Turns!
Homily for 3rd Sunday of Easter - Year A 2017
As you drive
around, I’m sure you have seen how a lot of churches use their signs out front
to come up with catchy slogans or funny anecdotes. Maybe you’ve seen some like
this:
· “There are some questions that can’t
be answered by Google”
· “Honk if you love Jesus. Text while
driving if you want to meet him”
· Sometimes they have an unintended
meaning like this one: “Don’t let stress kill you – let the Church help!”
One church on
French Road near my parents' house once had this one: “Our God allows
U-turns. “
I was
reminded of that sign when I was reflecting on the experience of the two
disciples on the road to Emmaus. They had just witnessed the execution of the
“one that they had hoped would redeem Israel”, and they were leaving Jerusalem
– maybe even fleeing Jerusalem – certainly confused, perhaps in fear. But then
they encountered Jesus – and their encounter of the Lord caused them to make a
U-turn, to go back to Jerusalem, to face whatever it was that was waiting for
them there.
I see this
U-turn in my ministry at Collins Correctional Facility. Just last Friday night I
was once again visiting with some of the men inside who have decided to turn
their lives over to Jesus. Some of them have done some pretty awful things –
but because of their encounter with the risen Lord, they too have made this
U-turn, to turn their lives around and face the difficult choice of walking as
a disciple instead of their previous way of life. The conversions I have seen
in that facility have amazed me, encouraged me, and touched my heart.
Some inmates
in our country, however, are deprived of this opportunity for conversion
because their lives are taken by capital punishment. Thankfully, we have
suspended capital punishment in NY, but if you have been following the news you
know that there have been 4 inmates executed in the past week in Arkansas – the
first executions in 12 years. Ledell Lee, Marcel Williams, Jack H. Jones Jr., and
Kenneth Williams, were all executed by lethal injection in Arkansas – and the
hurried pace was the result of the fact that one of the drugs that they use in
the procedure was due to expire at the end of this month.
Our US
bishops have called for an end to the death penalty since at least 1980 – most
prominently in a document from 2005 called “The Culture of Life and the Penalty
of Death”. They remind us that, in their
words, we need to “abandon the illusion that we can protect life by taking
life”. They go on to say that we must promote “a culture of life in which our
nation will no longer try to teach that killing is wrong by killing those who
kill. This cycle of violence diminishes all of us.”
Pope Francis
said this a couple of years ago: “Today the death penalty is inadmissible, no
matter how serious the crime committed. It is an offense against the
inviolability of life and the dignity of the human person…It does not render
justice to the victims, but rather fosters vengeance”.
But in spite
of the teaching of our Bishops, in spite of the strong opposition to the death
penalty of the last three Popes, and in spite of the fact that Jesus was the
victim of capital punishment, half of the Catholics in the US still support the
death penalty. Half!! We need to make a
U-turn of our own, away from the path of fear or revenge, or a misunderstanding
of justice, or whatever causes us to support capital punishment.
Our bishops have called us
to conversion and have suggested that we do four things:
1.
Pray for victims
of crime, those facing execution, and those working in the criminal justice
system;
2.
Reach out to the
families of those affected by violent crime by bringing Christ’s love and
compassion;
3.
Learn about the Church’s teaching on capital
punishment and educate others;
4.
Advocate for
better public policies to protect society and end the use of the death penalty.
Our God
does, indeed, allow U-turns; and we who have encountered the Risen Jesus are
called to turn away from capital punishment and to turn instead to embrace mercy,
to embrace forgiveness, to embrace life.
Monday, October 17, 2016
First, Be Reconciled
Homily for 29th Sunday in Ordinary Time
Can we talk about the election? Not the candidates, or the
issues, but the attitudes and conflicts that it has engendered not only in our
public discourse, but in our conversations within our Church. This election in
particular seems to be so much more vitriolic and nasty than those in the past.
Or maybe I’m just getting old.
A friend of mine posted a great meme on facebook the other
day. It said, “I just saved a ton of money on Christmas presents by discussing
politics on Facebook”. And there is too much truth to that to be really funny.
Bishop Malone released another “Consider This” on Friday
about Faithful Citizenship and voting. Bishop Malone: “Ordinarily I’d be
looking forward to the day after the election – at least the war of words would
be behind us. This time, however, I expect that I will feel no better about the
national situation then than I do right now. In fact, I may feel worse…”
Where will be as a nation after the election is over? Where
will be as a Church? Are we creating so many divisions based on our political
views that we forget the common good of the nation? Will we be able to start a
process of reconciliation and healing in our country, in our church, in our
families?
Think about today’s parable of the widow and “unjust judge”.
St. Luke tells us that it is about praying, but maybe there’s something else
going on as well. When you look at it carefully, it is clear that neither character
is morally exemplary, and neither is even likable.
In the parable, vengeance rules. It is the desire for
vengeance that drives the widow – this desire may be, especially in relation to
law courts, more pressing than the desire for justice. The parable challenges
us – do I want to be in the widow’s company?
The widow’s behavior is consistent: a person who seeks to be
avenged against her opponent is not a person who “loves her enemies”. And
certainly the judge perceives the possibility of getting a “black eye” if he
doesn’t rule in her favor. Whether it would really happen or not is not the
point – the judge believes that there is a real possibility of it.
Where was the attempt in the parable of the widow to
reconcile? Where was the attempt of the judge toward “restorative justice”
rather than retributive justice? The only closure that the parable creates is
that in which the widow and the judge – and so us, too! – become complicit in a
plan to take vengeance and certainly not to find reconciliation.
In another part of the Gospel, Jesus tells us that when we are
offering our gift at the altar, if we remember that our brother or sister has
something against us, we are to leave our gift there and first be reconciled to
our brother or sister, and then come and offer our gift.
What do each of us need to do to heal the wounds and
divisions that are being created among us now? Can we leave our gifts at the
altar and seek out those with whom we disagree so that we may be reconciled?
If you follow international affairs, you may have heard
about the peace agreement in Colombia. Colombia has suffered under a civil war
for 52 years. 52 years! And they finally negotiated a peace agreement that
would cease all the fighting, and would provide amnesty for some of the
fighters in the conflict. The agreement had to be put to a referendum for all
citizens. In supporting the referendum,
one woman said, “I don’t win anything if I continue to hate. I have to vote yes
because peace depends on each of us. There are more of us who are good, and we
simply have to keep fighting for a quiet country for our children and
grandchildren.” In the end, however, by a slight margin, the referendum
rejected the peace agreement. According to one family that a student of mine
has contact with, “we wanted more punishment for those who did bad things
during the war.”
There is no reconciliation in this parable, there is only
revenge. There is no compassion, neither by the judge for the widow nor by the
widow for the judge. The “justice” the unjust judge offers is not the justice
of God or a program of fairness – it is granting a legal decision based not on
merit, but on threat. Jesus was invested in fairness, reconciliation, and compassion.
As his disciples, as people of faith, we too must be willing to find the opportunities
for reconciliation and compassion – especially after a very contentious
election. So, his question at the end should give us pause: when the Son of Man
comes, will he find vengeance, and violence, and discord? Or will he find faith
on the earth?
Monday, September 26, 2016
Before It's Too Late - Homily for the 26th Sunday in Ordinary Time - C
23 Million. 23 million is the number of refugees that are
currently in the world. Over 5 million of them are from Syria and over half of
them are children under the age of 18.
Many of you know that I was privileged to go with Catholic
Relief Services to Greece and Serbia earlier this year to work with the Syrian
refugees – to see their plight, to hear their stories, to provide what aid we
could. So I was very interested to hear about the UN Summit for Refugees and
Migrants that was held earlier this week.
At that Summit, President Obama read a letter from Alex
who saw the picture of 5 year old Omran Dagneesh, a casualty of the bombing in
Aleppo, as he sat filthy, bloodied, and dazed in the ambulance. Here is what
the letter said:
Dear President Obama,
Remember the boy who was picked
up by the ambulance in Syria? Can you please go get him and bring him to [my
home]? Park in the driveway or on the street and we will be waiting for you
guys with flags, flowers, and balloons. We will give him a family and he will
be our brother. Catherine, my little sister, will be collecting butterflies and
fireflies for him. In my school, I have a friend from Syria, Omar, and I will
introduce him to Omar. We can all play together. We can invite him to birthday
parties and he will teach us another language. We can teach him English too,
just like my friend Aoto from Japan.
And I will share my bike and I
will teach him how to ride it. I will teach him additions and subtractions in
math.
Thank you very much! I can't
wait for you to come!
Alex
6 years old
“We will give him a family and he will be our brother”.
I was thinking about Alex and about the rich man in the parable.
Alex was willing to share his toys, his time, his home – and make him his
brother. The rich man behaved as if he wasn’t even aware of Lazarus lying at
his gate, and if he was aware, he was too complacent to care. What had happened
to the rich man? Where did he lose the compassion and the kindness that even 6
year old Alex could display? Had he grown into a life of cynicism? Was he
ruined by a habit of self-indulgence? Did he just react to people like Lazarus
out of fear?
The rich man is not named in the parable – maybe he could
be any of us. It’s not his wealth that’s the problem – it’s his indifference. He
isn’t able to reach across the gap that separates him from Lazarus, and as a
consequence, that gap becomes an enormous abyss in the afterlife. After death,
he recognizes Lazarus, he even knows his name, but it’s too late. The abyss is
already too large to get across.
There is a gap, too, between us and young Omran and all
the Syrian refugees. In a sense, these refugees lie at our gate, perhaps not
covered in sores, but wanting only to take some of the crumbs that fall from
our very, very, rich table. They are:
·
Ahmed whom I met in Serbia - an electrical
engineer and who had to move his family three times to escape the bombing and
the violence that threatened him, his wife, and his four boys
·
Hiatt – whose husband was killed in this brutal
war, and who was making this trip with her 5 children. Her children hadn’t been
to school in three years because of the war, she explained, and she was trying
to find a new home where, in her words, her children could learn, and not just
learn war
·
Or Samir – a young boy of about 8 who lost his
shoe when his foot got stuck in the muck as he got out of the overcrowded
rubber raft that had brought him and his family from Turkey to Greece. Since we
didn’t have any shoes to give him, we tried to make a new shoe out of 5 or 6
pairs of socks
·
Or Saad, Nabil, and Hussein – three young men in
their 20s whose families had sent them all on ahead to be “ice-breakers” as
they are called – to find places to live for their families to establish a base
so that they could pave the way for their Mom and Dad, brothers and sisters,
Grandma and Grandpa.
In commenting on this parable earlier in the year, Pope
Francis said that as long as Lazarus was lying in front of his house, there was
a chance for salvation for the rich man – but once they are both dead, the
situation was irreparable. It was too late.
The rich man had squandered his chance to do the right
thing. He had missed the sign of God’s kingdom in the everyday affairs of his
life.
We must reach out to Lazarus, and Ahmed, and Hiatt, and
Samir, and Saad, and Nabil, and Hussein and bridge the gap – “give them a family
and make them our brothers and sisters “– and we have to do it now - before
it’s too late.
Wednesday, December 2, 2015
The Waiting Place
Homily for school children for the Wednesday of the First Week of Advent
I really don't like waiting, do you? I don't like
it, but it seems like I do so much of it. What are some examples of where you have to wait?........
Dr. Seuss talks about waiting. Who likes Dr. Seuss?....One
of my favorite Dr. Seuss books is called “Oh, the Places You’ll Go” and it’s
about all the places that you can go to – but there are some dangers, too! In
the story he talks about what happens when you might get confused and then end
up in a place called “The Waiting Place”. He describes it as a useless place
where people are just waiting.
[From “Oh, the Places You’ll Go”]:
“The Waiting Place…for
people just waiting.
Waiting for a train to do
or a bus to come, or a plane to go
or the mail to come, or the rain to
go
or the phone to ring, or the snow to
snow
or waiting around for a Yes or No
or waiting for their hair to grow.
Everyone is just waiting.
Waiting for the fish to bite
or waiting for wind to fly a kite
or waiting around for Friday night
or waiting, perhaps, for their Uncle
Jake
or a pot to boil, or a Better Break
or a string of pearls, or a pair of
pants
or a wig with curls, or Another
Chance.
Everyone is just waiting.
We all have to spend some time in this "waiting
place" that Dr. Seuss talks about, but I don't think it has to be a
useless place. While we are waiting we can make good use of our time. What can
we do? Well, we could read a good book or call a friend on the phone. We could
make a list of things we need to do today or, we could even study for a Math
test. Well, maybe that's going a bit too far, but there are many things we can
do besides just waiting.
And that’s the lesson of Advent. Advent means "to
come." Do you know what's coming? Of course, Christmas is coming. This is
an exciting time, but it may also be a difficult time of waiting -- waiting for
the day when you can open the gifts that you see under the tree. What can we do
to make this time of waiting for Christmas more than just a useless time in the
waiting place? Well, we can think about the true meaning of Christmas. We can
think about Jesus and his love. We can think about giving instead of receiving.
We can enjoy all of the beautiful music and the decorations of the season like
the Advent wreath or setting up the Nativity in our homes. When we do those
things, we will find joy in the waiting place.
We can also do what Jesus did in the Gospel. You heard
that Jesus helped people by curing their illnesses and feeding them when they
were hungry. We can also make use of our time while we are waiting by helping
the people around us like Jesus did. We can be kind to them, we can do good
things for people who have less than we do, and we can always pray for everyone
who is hurting or sad.
Sunday, August 16, 2015
Homily for the 20th Sunday in Ordinary Time - Cycle B
Readings:
1st Reading: Proverbs 9:1-6
Psalm: Psalm 34:2-7
2nd Reading: Ephesians 5:15-20
Gospel: John 6:51-58
Jesus invites us all to
this table. What kind of meal do you expect when you come here?
1st Reading: Proverbs 9:1-6
Psalm: Psalm 34:2-7
2nd Reading: Ephesians 5:15-20
Gospel: John 6:51-58
Don’t you think we just about have an obsession with food in
this country? For one thing, we are really concerned about what goes into our
food, including additives, and dyes and preservatives. Plus we have at least two
cable TV channels devoted to food and cooking. Not to mention the commercials for all kinds of food and restaurants. And people are always posting on
Facebook where they are eating and what they are having.
Over the last four weeks we have been listening to the sixth
chapter of the Gospel of John – and each week we have heard another aspect of
Jesus as the Bread of Life, beginning with him feeding the five thousand plus, and
continuing to today when he says that we must eat his body and drink his blood
in order to have life.
This feeding and eating theme obviously has overtones about
the Eucharist and Mass– and I wonder what effect our cultural images of eating
have on our approach to the Eucharist. What is it that you expect to find when
you come to this table?
Maybe some of us come to the Eucharist only wanting a snack –
you know, you don’t want to fill up too much so you can save room for other
important things. You don’t really want to
think too heavily about anything – it will just be too much to digest.
Maybe some come to Mass like it’s a fast-food restaurant. We
come in as late as we can, we leave as soon as we can, and we don’t see any
real substance or enjoyment of the food while we’re here – we just want to kind
of “get it over with”. Oh, and if they could find a way to have a drive-through
feature, that would be GREAT!
Or maybe some look at Sunday Mass like it’s a Chinese
buffet. We really appreciate all the interesting things in front of us, but we
really don’t like all of them. We like to have a lot choice, but we really want
to pick and choose what we eat. We might like a lot of spiritual stories, but
if someone starts talking about abortion, we’d rather just leave that off of
our plate. Or we might really like the prayers and the songs, but if we are
called to feed the poor, it’s really kind of distasteful.
It might be that some people think of the Mass like they are
having a private, intimate dinner with their friend, Jesus. No one else really
counts as long as they have their time with him and can have a nice one-on-one
visit with him.
Perhaps some see the Eucharist like a family meal where we’re
all gathered around the table sharing our common experiences, our hopes and our
fears, our challenges and our aspirations. And each of us has brought something to
share and pass around, and as we are together we strengthen the bonds of the
family and our own understanding of who we are and why we are here.
Some might see the Eucharist like a banquet – the kind that
Woman Wisdom is throwing in the first reading. It is a grand event where all
are invited and we are sure to have rich foods and fine wine, and we are not
expected to bring anything other than ourselves. It is a feast that becomes a
significant event in our relationship with God and with one another. We come as
guests but we leave as friends – with Jesus as a part of us and we as a part of
him.
So which is it for you? Like Woman Wisdom, Jesus invites us
to his feast, to this table, to share in his wisdom and his very life – so that
he can remain in us and we can remain in him. And by being a part of him we
become him for others – ready to serve, to give of ourselves to our brothers
and sisters for the life of the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)