Homily for 29th Sunday in Ordinary Time
Can we talk about the election? Not the candidates, or the
issues, but the attitudes and conflicts that it has engendered not only in our
public discourse, but in our conversations within our Church. This election in
particular seems to be so much more vitriolic and nasty than those in the past.
Or maybe I’m just getting old.
A friend of mine posted a great meme on facebook the other
day. It said, “I just saved a ton of money on Christmas presents by discussing
politics on Facebook”. And there is too much truth to that to be really funny.
Bishop Malone released another “Consider This” on Friday
about Faithful Citizenship and voting. Bishop Malone: “Ordinarily I’d be
looking forward to the day after the election – at least the war of words would
be behind us. This time, however, I expect that I will feel no better about the
national situation then than I do right now. In fact, I may feel worse…”
Where will be as a nation after the election is over? Where
will be as a Church? Are we creating so many divisions based on our political
views that we forget the common good of the nation? Will we be able to start a
process of reconciliation and healing in our country, in our church, in our
families?
Think about today’s parable of the widow and “unjust judge”.
St. Luke tells us that it is about praying, but maybe there’s something else
going on as well. When you look at it carefully, it is clear that neither character
is morally exemplary, and neither is even likable.
In the parable, vengeance rules. It is the desire for
vengeance that drives the widow – this desire may be, especially in relation to
law courts, more pressing than the desire for justice. The parable challenges
us – do I want to be in the widow’s company?
The widow’s behavior is consistent: a person who seeks to be
avenged against her opponent is not a person who “loves her enemies”. And
certainly the judge perceives the possibility of getting a “black eye” if he
doesn’t rule in her favor. Whether it would really happen or not is not the
point – the judge believes that there is a real possibility of it.
Where was the attempt in the parable of the widow to
reconcile? Where was the attempt of the judge toward “restorative justice”
rather than retributive justice? The only closure that the parable creates is
that in which the widow and the judge – and so us, too! – become complicit in a
plan to take vengeance and certainly not to find reconciliation.
In another part of the Gospel, Jesus tells us that when we are
offering our gift at the altar, if we remember that our brother or sister has
something against us, we are to leave our gift there and first be reconciled to
our brother or sister, and then come and offer our gift.
What do each of us need to do to heal the wounds and
divisions that are being created among us now? Can we leave our gifts at the
altar and seek out those with whom we disagree so that we may be reconciled?
If you follow international affairs, you may have heard
about the peace agreement in Colombia. Colombia has suffered under a civil war
for 52 years. 52 years! And they finally negotiated a peace agreement that
would cease all the fighting, and would provide amnesty for some of the
fighters in the conflict. The agreement had to be put to a referendum for all
citizens. In supporting the referendum,
one woman said, “I don’t win anything if I continue to hate. I have to vote yes
because peace depends on each of us. There are more of us who are good, and we
simply have to keep fighting for a quiet country for our children and
grandchildren.” In the end, however, by a slight margin, the referendum
rejected the peace agreement. According to one family that a student of mine
has contact with, “we wanted more punishment for those who did bad things
during the war.”
There is no reconciliation in this parable, there is only
revenge. There is no compassion, neither by the judge for the widow nor by the
widow for the judge. The “justice” the unjust judge offers is not the justice
of God or a program of fairness – it is granting a legal decision based not on
merit, but on threat. Jesus was invested in fairness, reconciliation, and compassion.
As his disciples, as people of faith, we too must be willing to find the opportunities
for reconciliation and compassion – especially after a very contentious
election. So, his question at the end should give us pause: when the Son of Man
comes, will he find vengeance, and violence, and discord? Or will he find faith
on the earth?
